[ Login ]
There are 251 days until our 19th anniversary!
Serving Since:
December 06, 2001
for 6687 days

Nanlina

Country: United States
 
Nanlina's Blogs 1 Blog Entries
Though makes reducing switch, if that is the case scape even more persuasive   March 24, 2020, 4:13 pm
Not to mention, it being"absurd" is a reason there's people who have the OSRS gold 0.1% greatest DPS on the market, because they can juggle that stuff in addition to every other standard combat basic. The average RuneScape player never finds any shallow optimization"pleasure" or"accessible". There's room for reward spaces such as maybe another ring"slot machine" which has several drawbacks, but a lot of complaints 100% miss the point and falls on those RuneScape players to quit complaining and make the most out of what they have in their foundation kit without swaps.

Though makes reducing switch, if that is the case scape even more persuasive. Fact is, 99% of the RuneScape playerbase are playing on revo. Assuming flanking and ring buttons are insignificant for dps growth, why not eliminate the change scape related to them and allow skill expression be centered on matters that are meaningful such as implanted toes and spellbook swap?

This is advantageous because 1) reducing switch scape does make inventories and RuneScape match in general appearance neater and is attractive to the masses and 2) permit for the masses to really try harder bosses without blaming switches resulting in more purposeful improvement to fundamental dps rotation/understanding of boss mechanics. Flanking and ring change (and additional superfluous switches) are not meaningful anyways so this just removed them from the equation and keep the mechanics that diffenciate a man like you vs a revo user.

Rs3 includes a diminishing RuneScape playerbase due to mechanics that are clunky and the learning curve. Eliminating some switch scape makes the endgame more attractive to the main RuneScape playerbase but can eliminate a few of the learning curve assisting newer RuneScape players. It also opens up alternatives for new skill expression because if you no more need something like flanking or lunging or 3 rings and 2 necklaces, you now have stock space to research other mechanics or enable jagex to look more interesting/meaningful alternatives such as vuln bombs for all those spaces. Just my two cents. If you would like to get folks to PvM, then reducing the amount of switching is one of the least helpful things possible and will never get you the results you want, especially considering the fact that switches are not necessary for any material planned at the base level.

Nothing in RuneScape eases that until endgame (though Telos does this quite well), and nothing in RuneScape match requires any form of DPS test or ability or anything until endgame. What is too hard? Grind away until it can be overpowered by you using stats that are raw. The open-ended character of RuneScape, while having a lot of benefits in RuneScape player freedom, also hinders RuneScape player expansion for battle by not providing meaningful tests to demonstrate the RuneScape participant where they ought to be for battle. If Jagex wants individuals to get down with all the essentials of EoC That is bad. That's why folks are on buy rs3 gold Revolution, because they just don't know and stay with it after the beginning of RuneScape game. And also not even mentioning RuneScape's problems with core combat in of itself.
[ 5 Views | 0 Kudos | Add Comment ]
 

Displaying Page 1 of 1
 [  1  ]